Breakingviews on Twitter
Search League Tables

Monday, 30 May 2016

Shades of grey

China shadow bank shakeout would be welcome

A wealth product goes wrong; a bank blames a rogue employee. It sounds trivial. But in China, the crisis at lender Hua Xia could be the beginning of a shadow-bank shakeout. The country’s $2 trillion off-balance sheet financing channel may not stay off the balance sheet for much longer.

Bank customers have more than doubled their holdings of wealth management products since 2010, according to Fitch Ratings. These short-dated investments typically offer annualized returns of 3 to 4.5 percent, beating the 3 percent return on bank deposits, which is capped by regulators. Defaults are unheard of, and buyers range from buyers from pensioners to state-owned enterprises.

Hua Xia is a test of what happens when a product goes wrong. The bank says an employee in its Shanghai branch illegally sold a wealth management product, which Chinese media reported had then failed to repay investors. It’s not yet clear which path regulators will take. One option is to force Hua Xia to pay investors back in full, setting a precedent that banks are liable for the products they sell. The alternative is to leave buyers dangling.

The first option would effectively force $2 trillion of outstanding products – and the associated loans – onto the balance sheets of China’s lenders, increasing their assets by around a fifth. That would eat up capital, and push some banks far beyond the maximum loan-to-deposit ratios enforced by regulators.

But leaving buyers to bear losses isn’t much better. If they decline to roll over their investments - or demand higher yields - borrowers whose loans have been funded with wealth management products may hit the wall. This could turn into a disorderly run on the shadow banking system.

Ultimately, the best solution is to lift China’s deposit cap. If banks could compete for deposits, they would suck cash out of wealth management products and back into bank accounts. Lenders would lose fee income and see margins squeezed, and some shadow borrowers would get into trouble, but the sector would quickly shrink.

Wealth management products aren’t evil. But mispricing, and widespread selling to customers who don’t really understand the risks, make them dangerous. If Hua Xia proves a turning point, its long-term legacy could be a healthier financial system.

Have your say

To have your say, you have to be signed in

Related images

Context News

Hua Xia Bank said on Dec. 4 that an employee at one of its Shanghai branches had sold wealth products without permission, and a police investigation was underway. The Beijing-based bank said separately that income from the products was derived from a pawn shop and car sales company in Henan province.

China is projected to have 13 trillion yuan ($2.1 trillion) in outstanding wealth management products by the end of 2012, according to a report by Fitch Ratings on Dec. 5. Banks typically sell the products, which usually range from one month to a year in duration and offer fees averaging around 3 to 4.5 percent, but take no responsibility for protecting clients’ money.

Over 68 percent of respondents to a survey by financial magazine Caijing on Dec. 6 believed that banks should be held accountable for wealth management products where regulatory uncertainty exists. A further 28 percent believed banks should always be on the hook.

(Launches in a new window)