Power failure

26 November 2018 By Reynolds Holding Follow @holdingren

Facebook’s Russian-meddling fumbles and Amazon’s second-headquarters hubris are Exhibits A and B for legal reform. Derided as “hipster antitrust,” the idea that bigness alone can breed evil is true to competition law’s original aim. It’s time trustbusters became disruptors, too.

This content is for Subscribers only

To access full Breakingviews.com content you must be a subscriber. Please use the following link to request a trial.

Context News

Facebook Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg and Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg ignored and then tried to conceal warning signs of a Russian-backed campaign to use the social network for spreading fake content and meddling in the 2016 U.S presidential election, the New York Times reported on Nov. 14.

On Nov. 13, Amazon announced that it will split its second headquarters between New York City’s Long Island City neighborhood and Arlington, Virginia, adjacent to Washington, D.C. The company will receive performance-based grants and tax credits of $1.5 billion from New York City and state authorities and $573 million of performance-based incentives from Arlington and the Commonwealth of Virginia.

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission on Sept. 13 began a series of hearings on competition and consumer protection, with a view to updating its policies in those areas. The hearings are expected to continue through January.

The U.S. Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. has scheduled oral arguments for Dec. 6 in the Justice Department’s appeal of the dismissal of its lawsuit to block AT&T’s $85 billion merger with Time Warner. The transaction was completed on June 14.

Email a friend

Please complete the form below.

Required fields *