Hubris and nemesis

25 November 2008 By John Foley Follow @johnsfoley

Rio s board looks remiss for not accepting an allshare offer when it had the chance. BHP s board looks foolish for its hubris. But given the problems a merger would have created among customers and lenders, these failings may be a blessing in disguise.

This content is for Subscribers only

To access full Breakingviews.com content you must be a subscriber. Please use the following link to request a trial.

Context News

BHP Billiton said its $66bn allstock offer for rival AngloAustralian miner Rio Tinto was no longer in the best interest of its own shareholders, citing falls in commodity prices and the heavy debt load of a potential combination.

Marius Kloppers, BHP's chief executive, said the decision also hinged on the diffculty of making divestments in iron ore and coking coal, which would be necessary for European Union antitrust approval, at a reasonable price.

BHP revealed its intention to bid for Rio in November 2007. It took out a $55bn loan facility from seven banks including Citi, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, Santander and Barclays, partly to refinance Rio's $38bn of net debt.

Search the Archive

Hubris and nemesis

This content is for Subscribers only

Email a friend

Please complete the form below.

Hubris and nemesis

This content is for Subscribers only

Existing Users Log In

Email a friend

Please complete the form below.