Energy Transfer investors are in another tangle. Pipeline partnership Sunoco Logistics Partners wants to buy Energy Transfer Partners for $21 billion, based on Friday’s closing prices. ETP’s parent, Energy Transfer Equity, tied itself in knots trying to buy rival pipeline operator Williams Companies last year, before walking away on a technicality. The sour reaction to the latest deal suggests ETP may also be headed for trouble.
The companies – both of which are effectively controlled by ETE – argue that getting together will give them bigger scale and a broader geographical footprint. That could be an advantage considering the recent controversy over the ETP-owned Dakota Access Pipeline, which has been the scene of clashes between protesters and police. The industry as a whole also looks set to benefit from incoming U.S. President Donald Trump’s promises to build infrastructure and cut red tape, especially for traditional energy companies.
If only it were that simple. In classic fashion for master limited partnerships, these two concerns are already heavily intertwined. ETP owns around a fifth of its would-be acquirer’s common units – the MLP-world equivalent of shares. It also exerts control over Sunoco through its 100 percent ownership of the general partner that mans and runs Sunoco’s pipelines. Sunoco lists itself as an ETP subsidiary in its SEC filings.
Meanwhile, Energy Transfer Equity, which ended up with extreme buyer’s remorse with Williams and was only able to avoid having to follow through on that $33 billion acquisition thanks to a legal loophole, controls ETP though ownership of its general partner. ETE Chief Executive Kelcy Warren runs both ETE and ETP. But he needs the approval of other ETP unit-holders for the Sunoco transaction to go through.
The initial reaction doesn’t look promising. Sunoco and ETP shares both fell nearly 10 percent shortly after the opening bell, pushing the deal value below $20 billion, before recovering some of their losses. ETE shares, meanwhile, rose a little under 3 percent, suggesting its shareholders may benefit the most from all the deck-chair shuffling. With the ETE-Williams debacle still fresh in investors’ minds, it looks like a bad omen.