We have updated our Terms of Use.
Please read our new Privacy Statement before continuing.

No Sergio Mergionne

27 May 2015 By Antony Currie

Sergio Marchionne is fighting for automobile industry mergers with one hand tied behind his back. The Fiat Chrysler boss argues consolidation will reduce expenses, improve shareholder returns and better prepare carmakers for a boom in assisted and driverless cars. General Motors has already rebuffed his approach, according to the New York Times, in part perhaps because such deals are messy, complex and distracting. Marchionne doesn’t help his cause, though, by playing down the scale of potential cost cuts.

He laid out a strong but surprisingly public case for mergers last month, arguing that about half the capital spending on new car development duplicates rivals’ efforts. The waste, he said, stops the industry from beating its cost of capital and causes auto stocks to trade at low multiples.

Yet he pegs the maximum amount of synergies from potential deals at just 4.5 billion euros ($5 billion) a year. That’s almost 2 percent of total industry sales, roughly what Daimler and Chrysler reckoned they could trim in their ill-fated 1998 merger. Applying the figures to a GM-Fiat Chrysler tie-up would imply a 2014 pre-tax margin of 6.4 percent for the combined company, excluding one-off items.

That easily beats the 1.75 percent Marchionne managed last year, but it’s not much more than what counterpart Mary Barra achieved at GM. It would take several years to accomplish, too. Meanwhile, Detroit’s biggest carmaker, presumably the buyer, would be saddled with lower returns and higher debt and have few benefits to look forward to.

GM and Fiat Chrysler have far more overlap than Daimler-Chrysler, though. Marchionne’s analysis excluded reductions in staff and brands, probably to avoid angering unions and governments fearful of mass job losses.

When a GM-Chrysler merger was mooted in 2008, cost cuts were estimated at $10 billion. Factor in meshing Fiat and GM-owned Opel in Europe, and the figure could hit $15 billion or more. That would be worth almost $100 billion to shareholders, once taxed, capitalized and discounted – more than the two companies’ current market value. The resulting pre-tax margin of 10 percent could make the deal more than a little enticing.


Email a friend

Please complete the form below.

Required fields *


(Separate multiple email addresses with commas)