Fat and unhappy

7 September 2017 By Robert Cyran Follow @rob_cyran

Take a plentitude of capital and a paucity of disasters. Mix in a Florida building boom and massive hurricane, and the result looks like a giant hit to reinsurers. But the history of catastrophes suggests underwriting won’t become much more rational when the storm clears.

This content is for Subscribers only

To access full Breakingviews.com content you must be a subscriber. Please use the following link to request a trial.

Context News

A hurricane watch is in effect for the state of Florida. The center of Hurricane Irma is projected to hit Florida on Sept. 10, according to the National Hurricane Center. The storm is one of the most powerful to ever be measured in the Atlantic. Current maximum sustained winds are 175 miles per hour, making it a category 5 hurricane.

Hurricane Andrew hit south Florida 25 years ago, causing $26.5 billion of damage. Swiss Re estimates that if a similarly sized storm followed the same path today, it would result in $50 billion to $60 billion of damage due to increased development and asset values. If the same hurricane directly struck Miami, the damage would be up to $300 billion and insured losses of $180 billion.

Search the Archive

Fat and unhappy

This content is for Subscribers only

Email a friend

Please complete the form below.

Fat and unhappy

This content is for Subscribers only

Existing Users Log In

Email a friend

Please complete the form below.