We have updated our Terms of Use.
Please read our new Privacy Statement before continuing.

Back to the future

24 April 2009 By Antony Currie

The bank has been debating the idea for 18 months or more. The credit crunch only increases the rationale if the move derisks the firm and gives it more credit as an asset manager. Meanwhile, UBS’s Dillon Read fiasco provides useful pointers.

This content is for Subscribers only

or
If you need assistance please email breakingviews.clientsupport@thomsonreuters.com
 

Email a friend

Please complete the form below.

Required fields *

*
*
*

(Separate multiple email addresses with commas)

We need you to verify your email address to continue. Please check your email/junk folder for our verification request.

Click here to resend the verification email.