Fast data, slow math
There’s no rule about Excel’s infallibility. Yet obvious spreadsheet errors still occur, even in the citadels of high finance. No less a practitioner than Goldman Sachs double-counted some of Tibco’s shares in calculating the business software company’s value in a sale worth $4.3 billion – oops, make that $4.2 billion. Both the firm and its client must have been distracted.
Mistakes happen. And this one didn’t affect the $24 per share that Vista Equity Partners agreed to pay for Tibco, or the thrust of Goldman’s analysis on whether the deal last month was fair. What happened was that someone counted a small number of restricted shares separately when they were already included in the much bigger total of common stock outstanding.
The result, once the agreed price per share was multiplied by the number of shares, was an inflated dollar valuation for Tibco, to the tune of about $100 million or a little over 2 percent. That’s not enough to change anyone’s mind about the deal, and certainly nothing remotely on the scale of the calculation errors that featured in JPMorgan’s $6 billion “London whale” losses in 2012.
As in the spreadsheets of widely cited economist Thomas Piketty, however, even minor infelicities undermine credibility. With Goldman in line for a fee of nearly $50 million, Tibco surely expected exemplary attention to detail. Then again, shareholders might have thought Chief Executive Vivek Ranadivé and finance lieutenants would have the enterprise’s dollar value to hand in real time, and to have noticed when Goldman’s number was off in the fairly obvious second significant figure.
Tibco touts the ability of its products “to capture the right information at the right time.” The lesson of Goldman’s snafu for companies and financial advisers alike is to double-check, in spreadsheets and any other software, that’s what is really happening.