We have updated our Terms of Use.
Please read our new Privacy Statement before continuing.

Summit for nowt

2 Sep 2016 By Peter Thal Larsen

The first time Barack Obama went to a meeting of the G20 in April 2009, leaders of the world’s largest countries agreed a $5 trillion stimulus to stop the global economy from sliding into a depression. Six months later they summed up the package in two words: “It worked”.

As Obama heads to his final G20 summit, politicians are once again touting the merits of government-led investment. But the backdrop is very different. Presidents and prime ministers gathering in the Chinese city of Hangzhou are now mostly concerned about the developed world’s persistently disappointing growth. Meanwhile, central banks, which have led the efforts to restore confidence, appear to be running out of ideas.

The result is a renewed belief in government spending. Many Western officials spent years warning of the dangers of higher deficits. Now U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew says the debate has shifted to “how to best employ fiscal policy to support our economies”.

Canada, South Korea and Japan have recently unveiled stimulus packages. Hillary Clinton has promised to invest $275 billion in America’s infrastructure if she wins the U.S. presidential election; her opponent Donald Trump pledges to spend twice that amount. Even the euro zone is loosening its purse strings: the European Commission recently decided not to fine Spain and Portugal for failing to rein in deficits as required by the currency union’s rules.

Three things have changed. First, austerity has failed to bring down borrowing: the developed world’s sovereign debt remains stubbornly high at almost 106 percent of GDP, according to the International Monetary Fund. Second, the record low yields on government bonds make it less likely that wider deficits will undermine creditworthiness. Third, there’s a growing recognition that state-led investment in infrastructure or education doesn’t just deliver a one-off boost output, but can also help raise an economy’s growth potential.

That doesn’t mean there will be a 2009-style splurge. Back then, the stimulus was partly automatic as tax revenues shrank and welfare payments rose. That’s not the case today. Moreover, most elected politicians still have to overcome a sceptical public and domestic opponents determined to curb spending. Obama, who spent most of his presidency battling deficit hawks in Congress, knows these constraints all too well. Any fiscal boost is likely to be modest, albeit welcome.


Email a friend

Please complete the form below.

Required fields *


(Separate multiple email addresses with commas)