Misty-eyed

10 October 2017 By Lauren Silva Laughlin Follow @TheRealLSL

His environment agency aims to reverse Obama-era pollution rules, while the energy department wants regulatory changes that favor nuclear and coal power generation. Even if both happen, the closure of a Texas power plant shows the economic and social forces pushing the other way.

This content is for Subscribers only

Subjects

Regions

Context News

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency head Scott Pruitt on Oct. 10 issued a notice to repeal the so-called Clean Power Plan, an Obama-era regulation that sought to reduce emissions dramatically. In a statement, Pruitt said the CPP had exceeded the limits of the EPA’s authority and was inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.

Secretary of Energy Rick Perry on Sept. 28 sent a letter to the members of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission proposing changes to rules governing the U.S. electrical grid. The proposed rules would help subsidize electricity providers capable of holding a 90-day fuel supply, effectively favoring nuclear and coal plants over, for example, renewable energy.

Luminant, a subsidiary of Vistra Energy, on Oct. 6 said that it would retire its 1,800 megawatt Monticello Power Plant in Titus County, Texas. The plant, in operation for more than 40 years, is one of the largest coal-fired plants in the state.

Email a friend

Please complete the form below.

Required fields *