Quieter whistles

22 February 2018 By Christopher Beddor Follow @cbeddor

Those who suspect U.S. securities breaches must tell regulators or lose some protection from vengeful employers, the Supreme Court says. Major misconduct should still get reported. But small stuff might fall through the cracks – depriving companies of a chance to tackle it early.

This content is for Subscribers only

To access full Breakingviews.com content you must be a subscriber. Please use the following link to request a trial.

Context News

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Feb. 21 that whistleblower protections from retaliation under the 2010 Dodd-Frank legislation apply only to employees that approach regulators.

The case involved Digital Realty Trust, an American firm that dismissed a former employee who had reported alleged wrongdoing within the company.

The high court ruled that while the 2010 law’s protections from retaliation covered employees that took complaints to the Securities and Exchange Commission, those protections did not extend to whistleblowers reporting misconduct only to internal corporate units.

Email a friend

Please complete the form below.

Required fields *

Quieter whistles

This content is for Subscribers only

Existing Users Log In

Email a friend

Please complete the form below.